5 States In the Worst Financial Condition

HomePolitics5 States In the Worst Financial Condition
Share Button

These are tough times in Illinois. In June, Moody’s downgraded the state’s credit rating to just a couple of steps above junk-bond status. For the second straight year, the state government failed to reach a budget, and education officials braced for the prospect of closing down hundreds of schools. The situation prompted Gov. Bruce Rauner to tell reporters, “We are like a banana republic.” Yet several other states may be in even worse fiscal shape. In June, George Mason University’s Mercatus Center released a study ranking all 50 states according to their fiscal solvency, or their ability to meet short-term and long-term financial obligations. Here are the five most fiscally troubled states in the study.


5. Kentucky

Despite its rural nature, Kentucky has the budget problems of much larger, more urban states.

As in many other states these days, there has been bitter infighting in the capital over how to allocate more limited resources. Earlier this year, after Gov. Matt Bevin (R) cut funding to the state’s public universities and colleges by 4.5 percent ($41 million) the Democratic attorney general, Andy Beshear, sued him. Bevin is eyeing some $650 million in budget cuts in the next couple of years to start paying down Kentucky’s estimated $30 billion public pension debt. These unfunded liabilities to retirees are a common thread among states with the greatest financial strain.

Incidentally, nine of the 10 states with the worst fiscal standing in that Mercatus study voted for Barack Obama in the past two presidential elections. Kentucky is the lone exception. Conversely, all 10 of the states in the best fiscal condition voted for the GOP contender in those two elections. GOP legislators don’t have all the answers in forging a budget, but the limited-government philosophy of conservatives tends to lead to greater fiscal health for cities and states.


4. Illinois

Chicago and the rest of Illinois face budget cuts as the governor tries to pay off long-term pension debt. © Tim Hamilton

Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner, who vowed to fix the state’s long-term public pension outlook when he took office in 2015, is at odds with the state legislature, which has long been controlled by Democrats. The government reached a partial spending agreement in late June to fund schools for another year, and human services and other obligations through the end of 2016. But for the second straight year, Illinois is operating without a budget, and the state faces high debt and other financial woes. The state’s unfunded pension liabilities of $298 billion stand out in the Mercatus study. But even in its ability to meet other long-term and short-term obligations, Illinois is near the bottom of the rankings.


3. New Jersey

The Great Falls of the Passaic River in Paterson, N.J. © Merle 9999 via Flickr

The Mercatus researchers looked at five areas of fiscal health for each state: the abilities to pay short-term bills and meet long-term spending commitments are self-explanatory. So is trust fund solvency, or the ability to meet obligations such as pensions. The study also looked at budget solvency, whether or not a state’s current revenue exceeds expenses. New Jersey ranks well below average for all 50 states in all four of those categories, standing 50th in long-term solvency, and 49th in budget solvency. The only bright spot for the Garden State is it ranks 20th in service-level solvency, which measures a state’s amount of “slack” in raising taxes or increasing spending to meet fiscal obligations.


2 Massachusetts

The Boston skyline. The state of Massachusetts fares poorly on several measures of solvency. © Bill Damon

Residents in this state are on the hook for $14,517 in debt per capita, second only to New York ($17,405). As with almost two-dozen other states in the wake of the Great Recession, tax revenue in Massachusetts has not recovered to pre-recession levels; the state projects it will collect almost $1 billion less revenue than expected for the current fiscal year, forcing legislators to scramble to balance the budget. Massachusetts ranked 50th among U.S. states in cash solvency (ie. Is there enough cash on hand to pay short-term bills?). On a positive note, the state ranks 20th in terms of its ability to meet long-term commitments in pensions, retiree health care, etc.


1. Connecticut

Legislators in the Connecticut state capitol in Hartford face some tough budget decisions in the next couple of years. © J. Glazer

If there’s any consolation for Connecticut, it did not finish last in the Mercatus study; that dishonor went to Puerto Rico. But among the 50 U.S. states, Connecticut ranked very poorly in several categories, including short-term and long-term solvency (ranked 49th and 47th, respectively) and budget solvency, where it ranked 50th. So how does Connecticut get out of this hole? Some residents will not like the solution. In June the governor’s office sent state agency leaders a memo to expect a 10 percent or greater cut in discretionary spending for the next two years. “As a result, we will be significantly challenged to provide all of the services and programs that many have come to expect,” the memo reads. “In many cases, I expect agencies may need to further reduce, or perhaps cease delivering altogether, certain programs or services, and additional headcount reductions may be necessary.”

Written by

The author is a longtime professional journalist who has interviewed everyone from presidential contenders to hall of fame athletes to rock 'n' roll legends while covering politics, sports, and other topics for both local and national publications and websites. His latest passions are history, geography and travel. He's traveled extensively around the United States seeking out the hidden wonders of the country.